tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post4454570685463672350..comments2023-10-17T13:52:38.731-04:00Comments on Bay Ridge Blog: New York Subway vs London UndergroundUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-83821300457687483882010-07-28T11:28:23.746-04:002010-07-28T11:28:23.746-04:00I agree with Cooper, the newspapers are always lef...I agree with Cooper, the newspapers are always left for other people who didn't bring their mp3 or a book. It's part of the culture.<br /><br />In terms of actual garbage I rarely see any.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-69006034198533642442009-08-19T01:41:01.157-04:002009-08-19T01:41:01.157-04:00South London doesn't have soil conducive to bu...South London doesn't have soil conducive to building underground. <br /><br />And talking about discarded newspaper on the Underground? Surely you noticed that people put the papers behind their seats so others can then read them?It's not like littering.Cooperhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18011629284669263684noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-75592869809713118902009-08-06T17:01:23.293-04:002009-08-06T17:01:23.293-04:00The 656 miles of track is based on measuring all t...The 656 miles of track is based on measuring all the separate lines, sidings etc. Its not the correct way to measure a rail network. <br /><br />London would have a similar amount if measured this way. A four lane highway a mile long is not 4 miles long!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-59363033774295454502009-08-01T18:23:58.472-04:002009-08-01T18:23:58.472-04:00The London Underground barely touches large parts ...The London Underground barely touches large parts of south and east London. The north west is very well served buth the south east London has no Underground coverage. Plus, outside the centre, it is very hard to take cross-city trips on the Underground.Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09375787367326853493noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-68884176074384699202007-03-10T18:39:00.000-05:002007-03-10T18:39:00.000-05:00Believe it or not, I have used those three systems...Believe it or not, I have used those three systems over the past seven years. I loved them all.<BR/><BR/>I think NY's system is cleaner than you give it credit for.<BR/><BR/>And it does run 24/7, which none of the other systems do.The Phantomhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12682419312410424354noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11977927.post-85058627527521158772007-03-09T03:29:00.000-05:002007-03-09T03:29:00.000-05:00Have you ever visited Tokyo, Hong Kong, or Singapo...Have you ever visited Tokyo, Hong Kong, or Singapore? All of these cities beat the NY Subway system hands down.<BR/><BR/>The ammount of filth in the subway stations in NYC is disgusting. The subway stations in Calcutta (yes, they do have one subway line) are actually cleaner than the ones in New York.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com